The happenings "inside" the Wisconsin State Treasury and across the street at the State Capitol

Archive for January, 2012

Poll Question for 1/31/2012

 

Check back tomorrow and we will fill you in on why we are asking this question!


Treasurer’s Top 5: Crawford County

Hello! Once again, we present the Top 5 people who have unclaimed property by county. Today we spotlight Crawford County. Have you searched for your missing cash? Click here!

Crawford County

Gerald Longnecker – Prairie du Chien

Leonard Urbaniak – Prairie du Chien

Mary Redington – Eastman

Bessie Malven – Prairie du Chien

Dennis Cota – Prairie du Chien

 If you or someone you know is on this list, please let them know they need to make a claim with the office. They can also call us at 855-375-CASH

Related articles


$4 Million Plus Month for January 2012

My staff returned $4,003,873 in unclaimed property for the month of January. This is the second highest month of returns in Office history.

We have been promoting the unclaimed property unit extensively and redesigned our website making it easier to make claims and see what the office is doing daily. There have been mornings where more than 700 claims have come into the office and examiners worked fast to turn them around and return that money.

In the 13 of 20 days this month that claims examiners worked, they returned anywhere between $100,000 and $472,000. The highest return day was January 10 where the office returned $472,273.

 The increase may be attributed to a radio ad heard statewide urging people to search for unclaimed property. You can hear that radio ad by visiting our website www.wismissingmoney.com and clicking play on the new YouTube Feature right on the center of the homepage!

In 2011, claims examiners returned a record $33,641,807 in missing money and assets to more than 26,000 people and businesses. The highest monthly return occurred November 2010 when claims specialists gave back $5,185,680.

When you visit www.wismissingmoney.com, you can track the daily return rate right there on the homepage. We update “The Money Tracker” Monday thru Friday after 2PM. While visiting the revamped Treasury website, you can also see the names of the Top 20 people by county with unclaimed property held by this office.

 


AB 426 passes

Last evening, AB 426, which I testified in favor of, passed the Assembly. Below is a link to how the representatives voted:

http://ow.ly/8IHLu


Testimonies on SB 294, 295, and 296 from Yesterday

Testimony of Wisconsin State Treasurer Kurt Schuller to the Wisconsin State Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations Regarding SB 294

January 25, 2012 

Delivered on Behalf of the State Treasurer by Deputy State Treasurer Scott Feldt

 

            From time to time it is important to make small alterations to existing statutes in order to improve the efficiency of government as well as the services that government provides. I am grateful to Chairman Zipperer and this committee for giving me the opportunity to strongly advocate the passage of SB 294 here today.

            SB 294 establishes an administrative review process for an unclaimed property claimant whose claim is denied or not acted upon in a timely manner. Current law only provides for a claimant to bring an action in circuit court, which requires the claimant to pay for court costs even before a decision can be made. An administrative review process would establish a uniform procedure for handling complaints, would proceed in a much timelier manner, and would not result in mandatory costs or fees, thus making the process more amenable to both the Unclaimed Property Program and to the claimant.

           The Department of Justice recommended this process to the Treasurer’s Office, and I believe that the time has come to institute this reform.  

 

Testimony of Wisconsin State Treasurer Kurt Schuller to the Wisconsin State Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations Regarding SB 295

January 25, 2012 

Delivered on Behalf of the State Treasurer by Deputy State Treasurer Scott Feldt 

                 I would like to thank Chairman Zipperer and the members of the Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations for accepting my testimony on behalf of SB 295.

                The passage of SB 295 would provide an extra layer of protection for unclaimed property owners who enter into agreements with “search firms” or unclaimed property “locators”. The bill would require that the afforementioned firms provide the Unclaimed Property Program with a copy of the fee agreement that they entered into with the unclaimed property owner at the time of the claim submission. With this information in hand, the Unclaimed Property Program can proceed to process the claim with every assurance that the property owner and the search firm have entered into a legal agreement.

SB 295 will protect our state’s unclaimed property claimants without causing search firms undue difficulty, and I encourage the members of this committee to pass this bill in order to ensure full compliance with statutory requirements.

 

Testimony of Wisconsin State Treasurer Kurt Schuller to the Wisconsin State Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations Regarding SB 296

January 25, 2012 

Delivered on Behalf of the State Treasurer by Deputy State Treasurer Scott Feldt

 

                   Once again, I am pleased to present testimony before Chairman Zipperer and the Committee on Judicary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations regarding the amendment of the Unclaimed Property Act.

                  I am here to register my complete support to SB 296, which would grant the Unclaimed Property Administrator discretion when determing whether or not to assess penalties and interest against businesses not in compliance with current statutory requirements. Our office does not want to be forced to assess penalties on businesses who fail to report due only to innocent oversight.

                As a small agency, my office has never had sufficient staff to enforce the statute as currently written. However, due to technological advances, we are now able to make a major push to increase compliance – which we have long wished to do. By allowing the Unclaimed Property Administrator the discretion prescribed by SB 296, my office can focus on bringing Wisconsin businesses into compliance with our unclaimed property laws without causing those businesses undue economic hardship. SB 296 is a win for both the Unclaimed Property Program and Wisconsin businesses, and I encourage its passage.  

 

 

 


AB 426 passes the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy, and Small Business

Only a few minutes ago AB 426, which I testified in favor of, passed the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy, and Small Business. The bill’s next stop is the Assembly, where it could see a vote as early as later this week. Stay tuned for more updates.

Click here to see the testimony I submitted at the committee hearing in Hurley earlier this month.

The final vote on the bill was 9-5.


Changes to Statute 177 Getting Closer to Being a Reality

Background:

Last week I updated you on legislation that would tweak Statute 177, the Unclaimed Property Statute. Today, I would like to update you on what’s been going on with these bills “under the dome”.

Click here to read about the detail of the legislation.

Click here to read about where the legislation stood last week.

Remember, the bills were introduced in both the Assembly and the Senate in order to speed up the process of passage, hence:

SB 294=AB 417,   SB 295=AB 418,   and SB 296=AB 419

Legislative Status

AB 417 – Waiting for a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics – could happen in the next 2 weeks.

AB 418 – Had hearing in the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs on 1/18/12 (see Treasurer’s testimony). Waiting to be voted on in executive session, which may be scheduled soon.

AB 419 – Had hearing in the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs on 1/18/12  (see Treasurer’s testimony). Waiting to be voted on in executive session, which may be scheduled soon. SBs 294, 295, and 296 – Will have a hearing tomorrow in the Senate Committee on  

SBs 294, 295, and 296 – Will have a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations tomorrow at 1 P.M. Deputy State Treasurer Scott Feldt will be delivering my testimony before the committee.


Treasurer’s Top 5: Dane County

This week we stay close to home as we give you the top 5 people in Dane County who have money/assets that belong to them! But they’re not the only ones. Search now your missing cash!

Dane County

John Bracken – Madison

Andrew Brackern – Madison

Eduardo Anders – Madison

Catherine Forbes – Madison

Cecilia Jaegg – Madison

 If you or someone you know is on this list, please let them know they need to make a claim with the office. They can also call us at 855-375-CASH


Almost $3 Million Returned For January

…and we still have 7 days to go in the month!

In case you haven’t noticed, our new website offers a counter that will show how much we have given back every day. it get’s updated anytime after 2PM Central with the most recent return amount.

Today, we hit $2,926,708. We’ve had quite a few days where we’ve returned nearly half a million dollars…in just that one day!

Follow the counter by visiting www.wismissingmoney.com.

 


Why We Send 1099 Forms if You Have Claimed Property

Many people who claimed property in 2011 will start receiving 1099 forms in the mail for their taxes.

We are required by the Federal Government to report certain types of payments to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

If your payment included interest paid to you, you will receive an IRS 1099INTform.

If you received cash from the proceeds of the sale of stock or mutual funds, you will receive an IRS 1099-B form.

If your payment included any accrued cash dividends on securities, you will receive an IRS 1099-DIV form.


Looking for some Valentine’s Day Jewelry…cheaper than a Store?

Look no further than our January eBay Auction.

22 Karat gold Choker, earrings, rings and charms!

This might be our most popular item in the auction! Check it out here. No bids yet since the auction starts at $400. But, the amount of gold in here is well more than $400.

Platinum Ring

Gold and Platinum

 

Here’s auction 14J.  Plenty of gold and a platinum diamond ring 1/4 carat. Bid is low now…get in now!

You can sign up for our auction email and get a head start pricing items out! We send the email a day or two before items go up…giving subscribers a chance to see what’ we have before the general public! Click here to sign up!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.


FAQ: What do the terms “Abandonment Period” and “Activity” mean?

The term “Abandonment Period” refers to the period of inactivity, which is usually 1 to 5 years when the owner cannot be contacted and after that the property is considered abandoned.

The term “Activity” refers to the action taken on a property by the owner which includes things like making a deposit or withdrawal, negotiating a check, or a documented communication by the owner to the Holder.


January eBay Auction starts Friday Jan. 20th

We have some great items in this month’s auction – plenty of diamond rings, lots of silver coins, 22karat gold jewelry and some antique photograph frames with pictures from the 1800′s.

One of the most popular items, we think, will be two of the Topps football cards we are auctioning. perfect timing for the NFL Championship weekend coming up…despite the Packers not being there this year. One is a Joe Montana rookie and the other, a Walter Payton rookie! Click HERE to see all items in the auction!

Walter Payton Rookiethere this year.

Joe Montana Rookie


Testimony on AB 419

Testimony of Wisconsin State Treasurer Kurt Schuller to the Wisconsin State Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs Regarding AB 419

January 18, 2012

                  Once again, I am pleased to present testimony before the Assembly Committee on Homeland Secuirty and State Affairs regarding the amendment of the Unclaimed Property Act.

                     I am here to register my complete support to AB 419, which grants the Unclaimed Property Administrator discretion when determing whether or not to assess penalties and interest against businesses not in compliance with current statutory requirements. Our office does not want to be forced to assess penalties to those businesses who fail to report due to innocent oversight.

                   As a small agency, my office has never had sufficient staff to enforce the statute as currently written. However, due to technological advances, we want to make a major push to increase compliance. By allowing the Unclaimed Property Administrator the discretion prescribed by AB 419, my office can focus on bringing Wisconsin businesses into compliance with our unclaimed property laws without causing those businesses undue economic hardship. AB 419 is a win for both the Unclaimed Property Program and Wisconsin businesses, and I encourage its passage.  


Testimony on AB 418

Testimony of Wisconsin State Treasurer Kurt Schuller to the Wisconsin State Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs Regarding AB 418

January 18, 2012

 I would like to thank Chairman Van Roy and the members of the Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs for accepting my testimony on behalf of AB 418.

 AB 418 is intended to provide an extra layer of protection for unclaimed property owners who enter into agreements with “search firms” or unclaimed property “locators”. The bill would require that the afforementioned firms provide the Unclaimed Property Program with a copy of the fee agreement that they entered into with the unclaimed property owner at the time of the claim submission. With this information in hand, the unclaimed property program can proceed to process the claim with every assurance that the property owner and the search firm have entered into a legal agreement.

 AB 418 will protect our state’s unclaimed property claimants without causing search firms undue hassle, and I encourage the members of this committee to pass this bill in order to ensure full compliance with statutory requirements.


Treasurer’s Top 5: Clark County

Well it looks like there are some people in Clark County who have some unclaimed property. We’d love to return it to you, so here’s the top 5 people in Clark County who have money/assets that belong to them but they don’t know it! Have you searched for your missing cash? (http://www.statetreasury.wisconsin.gov)

Clark County

Irene Rogers – Greenwood

Dorothy Brown – Neilsville

Barbara Urban – Neilsville

Joan Dixon – Withee

Raymond Hodgden – Granton

 If you or someone you know is on this list, please let them know they need to make a claim with the office. They can also call us at 877-699-9211


Hearing Tomorrow on Statute 177 Changes

As I pointed out last December, the State Legislature is considering some important changes to Statute 177, the Unclaimed Property Statute. Since that time, 3 Assembly bills have been introduced that are equivalent to SBs 294,295, and 296. They are ABs 417, 418, and 419, and they are sponsored by Rep. Bill Kramer (R-97).

AB 417 was referred to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics, and will likely have a hearing in early February.

ABs 418 and 419 were placed in the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs. These 2 bills will have a hearing tomorrow, at which I will testify.

SBs 294, 295, and 296 were referred to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, and will hopefully have a hearing soon.

Tomorrow, I will post a copy of my testimony.


Treasurer’s Testimony on AB 426 from Wednesday, January 11

Testimony of Wisconsin State Treasurer Kurt Schuller Before the Wisconsin State Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy, and Small Business Regarding AB 426

January 11, 2012

I would like to begin my testimony today by thanking Chairperson Williams, Vice-Chairman Endsley, and the members of the committee for allowing me to express my firm support for AB 426. As members of the Committee on Jobs, Economy, and Small Busines, I am sure that you are all aware that the people of Wisconsin are crying for jobs. People in Northern Wisconsin are dying for them.

            Today, we are sitting in Iron County, a county that lost nearly 14% of its population between 2000 and 2010. This region’s economic health is failing; AB 426 holds the cure, and we as public officials have a responsibility to do everything in our power to foster job creation for the people of Northern Wisconsin.

            AB 426 provides common sense regulatory reforms which would allow for the development of thousands of jobs both in the Northland and Wisconsin as a whole.

            The Economic Impacty Study conducted by Northstar Economics Inc. projects the creation of 3,175 jobs for the construction of the mine over a two year period, and 2,834 long term jobs once the mine is up and running. Of those 2,834 jobs, 700 of them would be created directly by the mine, 953 of them would be created in the transportation industry, and 1,181 jobs would be created through indirect or induced effect – this includes jobs created by increased economic acticty in Northern Wisconsin communities, as well as jobs created in Southern Wisconsin related to the iron industry.  These job totals should double if the mine proceeds through both of the currently proposed developmental phases.

            Now is not the time for obstruction. I urge members of this committee to support AB 426. Our neighbors in Minnesota and Michigan are already engaged in iron mining, and surveys show that people in Northern Wisconsin want mining. This is an opportunity that we owe the region and the state.

Thank you.

 


FAQ: What if an EdVest beneficiary receives a scholarship?

In the event that a scholarship or grant is awarded to the designated beneficiary, including nontaxable grants, then funds from the EdVest account (up to the amount of the scholarship) can be returned to the account owner penalty free.

Note: Please keep a proof of receipt of the scholarship for the account owners tax records.

For more information on EdVest, click here!


The Economy & You #18 – Regional Multipliers continued

In my previous article, I wrote about the concept of regional economic multipliers. These multipliers estimate the effect a business expansion or plant closing would have on a local economy.  These multipliers project the change in economic output, income, and employment that results from a change in initial spending.

To calculate regional economic multipliers, economists construct input-output models to identify relationships among the different industry sectors within a regional economy. An input-output model is a mathematical description of how all sectors of an economy are related. In constructing an input-output model, economists separate economic activity into industry sectors to determine the value of goods and services as they flow from businesses which produce the goods and services to businesses that purchase them. Input-output models assume that for each industry in the region that a constant relationship exists between the value of the goods and services they produce and the value of goods and services (inputs) they purchase.  This assumption allows economists to quantify the economic impact estimate a business expansion will have on the region. 
In practice, the value of the regional multiplier is dependent on whether households are considered part of the interrelated industry sectors, or as a component of final demand outside the regional economy. Separating households from this valuation is subjective and will affect the estimated regional multiplier.

If households are included in industry sectors, then household spending is considered part of the multiplier effect because households earn income from the labor they provide businesses and the amount that consumers (households) spend is dependent on the income they earn.  If households are only considered as part of the final demand, then the income that is earned and the “respending” that occurs is not included in the total economic effect.

Therefore, multipliers that include households in the economic effect calculations are called “closed models” and the multiplier is larger than those “open models” that treat households only as part of the final demand.  Multipliers that are derived from open models are referred to as Type I or simple multipliers, while those derived from closed models are called Type II or total multipliers.

When regional multipliers are calculated there are usually three types of multipliers that can be derived: the standard output multiplier, an income multiplier, and an employment multiplier.  An output multiplier calculates the total value of sales of the regional economy needed to satisfy the demand resulting from the new business expansion or contraction.  This is the regional multiplier that is presented to quantify the effect of a new business coming into a regional economy.  Income multipliers estimate the change in regional household income by translating the effects of changes in demand into changes in household income.  Employment multipliers estimate the number of jobs that will be created from the created from a business expansion.  Most employment multipliers are estimated in terms of jobs and not full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). Unfortunately, the relationship between jobs and FTEs is not the same.  This is why comparison of employment multipliers is not always accurate.  Many times, they do not identify the mix of full and part-time workers.

While multipliers help to project the economic impact on a regional economy, caution must still be taken.  There are transitory effects in that multipliers estimate short-term economic changes. They do not take into account a regional economy’s long term adjustments.  In addition, multipliers used in impact studies are often generated on data based on transactions for a period that occurred five or more years earlier.  The cost to conduct a full survey to develop new input-output coefficients is very expensive. So existing models often use data that is several years old, and even if a new survey is conducted, it may take years to complete. A business may have significantly expanded or contracted since the survey was conducted which changes the data. Finally, relative prices for inputs may have changed which alters purchasing patterns. Because of these challenges, economic impact estimates may be inaccurate. 

Regardless of the challenges of timely data and projecting business production and purchasing patterns, the input-output models assist in describing the economic changes that are likely to occur as a result of a single event    within a relatively short period of time.  It is this information that helps decision makers and local residents decide whether a proposed development project is in the best interests of their community.


Treasurer’s Top 5: Jackson County

We’re heading out West today to Jackson County. So if you live in Jackson County your name just might be on this list. But even if it isn’t or you live somewhere else please head over to our website to see if you or someone you know has unclaimed property.

Jackson County

Kenneth Hunter - Hixton

Dorothy Pietras – Alma Center

Nelson Fleetguard – Black River Falls

Richard Presley

Thomas Dzick – Taylor

 If you or someone you know is on this list, please let them know they need to make a claim with the office. They can also call us at 877-699-9211


State Treasurer to Testify on Mining Bill

State Treasurer Kurt Schuller will be in Hurley Wednesday  morning to testify before the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy and Small Business on behalf of AB 426, which would create a more efficient permitting process for iron mining in Wisconsin.

“Iron mining has the potential to bring thousands of jobs to Wisconsin, principally to Northern Wisconsin, whose economy has been particularly hard hit in recent years” Treasurer Schuller said. “The regulatory changes proposed in AB 426 would maintain reasonable environmental safeguards that are specifically tailored to deal with the type of mining the region is able to support. We owe it to the people of Wisconsin to pass this bill.”

The hearing is being held at the Hurley Inn and starts 10:00 A.M.


Have You Heard Me On Your Radio?

We kicked off the New Year with an initiative aimed at getting more people to check out our website and look for their money…or their relatives’ money.

The first step was a radio ad that is playing across the state. If you haven’t heard it, click here to listen to it on our YouTube page – we added the graphics since a blank screen is boring.

Our next step in this push to get people to search their names and see how easy it is to claim money is a revamp of our website. We are hoping to unveil that in a few days.

It’s always important to remind people to check the database once a year. My staff is wrapping up getting all the new names into the system from last years’ reporting dates. We are also gearing up for the new safe deposit boxes to come in  for inventory.

Be on the lookout for the new website!


FAQ: Does EdVest have a rewards program?

Yes, EdVest account owners can earn Tuition Rewards Points each quarter, based on the balance of their EdVest account. Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC has partnered with SAGE Scholars to offer the Tuition Rewards program.

Here’s how the program works:

- One Tuition Rewards Point equals one dollar in guaranteed scholarships at a SAGE member school.

 - EdVest account owners now earn double the Points on their EdVest account balance – 10% annually (applied at 2.5% per quarter), up from 5% annually. This offer is valid through December 31, 2012. Each student registered by you into the Tuition Rewards Program will also earn 1,000 bonus points.

To enroll in this program please follow the steps below:

For more details please check out, www.tuitionrewards.com

To find out more about Edvest, Wisconsin’s College Savings Plan, please visit www.edvest.com


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,051 other followers